arXiv (All)
open access
Do LLMs Trust the Accuser or the Accusation? Measuring Belief Shifts in Werewolf
Social-deduction games such as Werewolf are increasingly used to evaluate LLM agents, but existing evaluations often rely on final game outcomes. We propose a belief-shift evaluation benchmark in Werewolf for analyzing communication skills through belief updating. Using LLM-played games, we annotate
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Collective Regimes in Multi-Agent LLMs under Reasoning Effort and Communication Topology#1130727
- MARBO: Relational Belief Grounding for LLM Agents in Social Deduction Games#974677
- Level-2 Inverse Games for Inferring Agents' Estimates of Others' Objectives#792649
- Level-2 Inverse Games for Inferring Agents' Estimates of Others' Objectives#788649
- Assertoric mindreading#709308
Record · ID 1000394
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive