ODU Digital Commons
metadata only
Failure Rates and Patient-Reported Outcomes Are Similar Across 5 Arthroscopic, Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis Fixation Techniques
Purpose To compare failure rates and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) across 5 arthroscopic, suprapectoral biceps tenodesis fixation techniques: tenodesis screw, tenodesis anchor, expanding tenodesis anchor, onlay with single all-suture anchor, and soft tissue tenodesis in the bicipital gro
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Failure Rates and Patient-Reported Outcomes Are Similar Across 5 Arthroscopic, Suprapectoral Bicepts Tenodesis Fixation Techniques#393085
- Superior Labral Tear From Anterior to Posterior (SLAP) Repair Versus Biceps Tenodesis for SLAP Tears in the Shoulder#1137788
- Clinical Outcomes, Return to Sport and Psychological Readiness After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Using Knotless All-Suture Anchors at a Minimum 2Year Follow-up.#186060
- An intraoperative methylene blue test can guide patient selection for totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy#10210
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Bedside Ultrasonography in the Management of the Shoulder Dislocations#1096256
Record · ID 1001612
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive