CanLII
metadata only
Esopenko v RM of Garden River #490
Decided: 2026-09-15. Docket: CACV4413. Citation: 2026 SKCA 102 (CanLII). Procedure — Pleadings — Motion to strike — The King’s Bench Rules, Rule 7-9 — Whether claims could be struck as time barred and for no reasonable cause of action — Plain and obvious threshold, Hunt v Carey Canada Inc. — Abuse of process analysis, Walker v Mitchell — Striking and amendment rulings upheld on appeal — Appeal dismissed | Limitation periods — Municipal limitation — Discoverability — The Municipalities Act, s. 344(1) — The Limitations Act, s. 6 — Whether action was brought and served within one year of discovery — Knowledge of essential elements from pleadings and counsel correspondence — Claim barred despite discoverability arguments — Appeal dismissed | Procedure — Pleadings — Reasonable cause of action —
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Plourde v Manitoba (Prosecution Service)#638474
- Foreword-A Labor Court of Appeals?#398407
- Sanja Boskovic v Mirabaud (Middle East) Ltd [2026] DIFC CFI 064 (20 May 2026)#252561
- Smith v. Oliphant#1053798
- McCormack v Alberta (Attorney General)#638440
Record · ID 1001768
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive