The University of Melbourne Library Digital Repository
metadata only
Response to Letter to the Editor on “A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Medial Stabilized Total Knee Prosthesis to a Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Design: A Report of the Clinical and Functional Outcomes Following Total Knee Replacement”
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Stability of the Medial Pivot Total Knee Prosthesis#835876
- Comparison of Vanguard XP and Vanguard CR Total Knee Arthroplasties. A Trial Evaluating Early Component Migration by RSA and Patient Reported Outcome.#833588
- Comparison of Mobile-Bearing and Fixed-Bearing All-Polyethylene Tibia Total Knee Designs#1094818
- Rate of Return to Sport After Total Knee Prosthesis: Comparison of Three Types of Prostheses#877303
- Study of the Clinical and Radiographic Results of a Fixed Polyethylene Posteriorly Stabilized Cemented Total Knee Prosthesis With a Minimum Follow-up of 1 Year.#869760
Record · ID 1005516
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive