PhilArchive
open access
Questions of reference
This paper defends a piece of conventional wisdom (that descriptivism fails) with conventional arguments (namely, from incompleteness and redundancy) against a recent case made by Jens Kipper and Zeynep Soysal.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Geach and Ascriptivism: Beside the Point#705107
- Galen’s Institutio Logica and al-Farabi’s Logic. A Reassessment of Parallelisms that Show a Possible Influence#171259
- The Direct Inverse Effect#775216
- Graded genericity#105762
- Counterfactuals, Accessibility, and Comparative Similarity#720666
Record · ID 100663
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive