ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Randomized Trial: High Power Short Duration Versus Ablation Index
The single procedure success rates of durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) varies between 80 and 90 %. This prospective, randomized study investigated the efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation with RF-energy following the CLOSE protocol with standard energy application (30 Watts) versus PVI with RF-energy with high power settings (45 Watts).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- First Line Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation Treatment (The RAAFT Study)#1124965
- High Power Short Duration Ablation Compared to Moderate Power Long Duration Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation#839916
- Randomized Controlled Trial- Ablation Strategy for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation - Trigger and Substrate Guided Wide Area Radiofrequency Ablation Compared to Pulsed Field Ablation Pulmonary Vein Isolation#1127208
- Adenosine Effect on Persistent Pulmonary Vein Isolation Line Evaluation (APPLE Trial)#873451
- Eagle AF (Atrial Fibrillation) - Endoscopically Guided Laser Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation#870986
Record · ID 1007158
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive