PhilArchive
open access
Can philosophy cure madness? Three approaches
This essay actually focuses on a kind of madness, where one perceives a lot of “hidden” messages (or interprets the world so that there are a lot of these messages). Perhaps there are other kinds of madness. Anyway, I describe my experiences of this kind and I make three philosophical proposals for combatting madness: a Cartesian one, a Wittgensteinian one, and my own one, which I call “particularist.” My own one seems the riskiest of the three. (You need to download this one if you want to read it - this is just an abstract!)
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Strategy, Pyrrhonian Scepticism and the Allure of Madness#119733
- Madness and Modernism: Insanity in the Light of Modern Art, Literature, and Thought#751761
- Understanding Madness?#86155
- Faces of Madness: Goya, Ensor, Van Gogh, Munch and Hodler#416568
- Delusions and Not-Quite-Beliefs#773904
Record · ID 100754
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive