ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Long-term Comparison of Stenting Versus Off-pump Coronary Bypass Surgery
The randomized comparison of two strategies in coronary revascularization: bypass surgery without the use of a heart lung machine and coronary stenting procedure. The comparison comprised the occurrence of cardiac adverse events after the procedure. In addition, costs, cognitive outcomes and angiography were assessed.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery#915589
- Coronariography in OUt of hosPital Cardiac arrEst#901556
- EUS - Guided Balloon-occluded Gastrojejunostomy Bypass#1010213
- iFR Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery#1088875
- Prospective, Multi-Center, Random. Study of CoStar Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent(Direct Stenting vs. Pre-Dilatation)#824950
Record · ID 1007938
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive