Conceptio › Archive › ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov public full text Public Domain

A Quick and Reliable Eye Movement Test to Help Diagnose ADHD in Children.

Onovis Augenpraxis · 2025
ClinicalTrials.gov · Datasets · License: Public Domain · 2025
Open Source ↗
adhdeye-movementseye-trackingneurodevelopmental-disorders
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) affects more than 5 % of children and adolescents, with a globally increasing prevalence. The condition imposes a significant burden on affected individuals, their families, and healthcare systems. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial to ensure timely therapeutic and educational interventions. However, current diagnostic practices rely heavily on clinical interviews and behavioral observations, which are inherently subjective and resource-intensive. There is a growing need for objective diagnostic tools that can complement or even partially replace current clinical assessments. One promising approach involves eye-tracking technology, as ADHD is associated with altered oculomotor control and attention-related neural circuits. These changes may be reflected in measurable eye movement parameters, including saccadic latency and fixation stability. This clinical investigation uses a certified, CE-marked medical eye-tracking device (neos™) to assess whether specific eye movement parameters can serve as objective biomarkers for ADHD. Although the device was originally designed to assess visual pathway integrity, it also captures parameters related to attention and executive function through standardized protocols. The test is examiner-independent, non-invasive, and takes approximately 10 minutes. The study is observational and non-interventional, involving two groups of participants aged 8 to 16: 50 children with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of ADHD and 50 age-matched non-ADHD controls. All participants will complete a single neos™ eye-tracking assessment. The primary hypothesis is that children with ADHD will demonstrate greater variability in saccadic latency and a higher frequency of large saccades (\> 3°) during fixation compared to controls. These differences will be analyzed as potential diagnostic biomarkers. Diagnostic accuracy will be evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, with s
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 1008446
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive