ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Copper T380 IUD Versus Oral Levonorgestrel for Emergency Contraception vs. Plan B for Emergency Contraception
The purpose of this study is to see if women presenting for emergency contraception (EC) are willing to accept the copper intrauterine device (IUD). This study will also compare the use of effective methods of contraception between women who selected the copper IUD or Plan B 6 months after they received EC.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Copper T380A IUD vs. Oral Levonorgestrel for Emergency Contraception#837551
- Effects of One-to-one Service on the Continuation and Satisfaction of Contraceptive Use.#909921
- A Pilot Study to Estimate the Impact of a Screening and Referral Service on Contraceptive Use#980918
- Self-management Intervention for Reducing Epilepsy Burden Among Ugandans With Epilepsy.#835508
- RAPID EC - Rct Assessing Pregnancy With Intrauterine Devices for EC#916720
Record · ID 1008493
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive