ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Video Laryngoscope Versus USB Borescope in Difficult Intubation
Video Laryngoscope Versus a USB Borescope Aided Endotracheal Intubation in Adults With Anticipated Difficult Airway
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Comparison of Video Laryngoscopes and the Direct Laryngoscope in Simulated Normal and Difficult Infant Airway.#909552
- Safety and Efficacy of Endotracheal Intubation Using Glidescope Video-Laryngoscope#811277
- McGrath Video Laryngoscope for All Intubations in the Operating Room#1113273
- Comparison of the Intubation Condition Between Two Different Types of Video Laryngoscope Blades#1010523
- Airway Evaluation by McGrath Videolaryngoscope#844766
Record · ID 1008563
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive