ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison Between Two Endotracheal Tube Cuff Inflation Methods
This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial, the primary aim of this study to compare the intracuff pressure which is performed by 2 inflation methods. ( study in pediatric patients 4-12 year old) Group1 : Flow -Volume Loop-guided cuff inflation Group2 : Stethoscope-guided cuff inflation Our hypothesis is Flow-Volume Loop-guided cuff pressure will be lower than Stethoscope-guided cuff pressure. This study also collect the incidence of common post-extubation respiratory adverse events coughing, hoarseness, stridor, croup as an secondary outcomes.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Is Endotracheal Tube Use Mandatory in Patients Undergoing Nasal Septum Surgery?#1074057
- TCHCCT-Zhong-Xing-Emergency-Department-airway-clincal (TTC)#1113431
- The Influence of Endotracheal Tube Design on Fluid Leakage Into the Lungs During Surgery#1056910
- The Effectiveness of Intracuff Dexmedetomidine in Preventing Postoperative Sore Throat Following Prone Surgery#827422
- Comparison of the Cuff Pressure of TaperGuard and Cylindrical- Endotracheal Tube During Laparoscopic Surgery#968022
Record · ID 1008800
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive