Conceptio › Archive › ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov public full text Public Domain

Comparison Between Two Endotracheal Tube Cuff Inflation Methods

Ramathibodi Hospital · 2018
ClinicalTrials.gov · Datasets · License: Public Domain · 2018
Open Source ↗
na
This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial, the primary aim of this study to compare the intracuff pressure which is performed by 2 inflation methods. ( study in pediatric patients 4-12 year old) Group1 : Flow -Volume Loop-guided cuff inflation Group2 : Stethoscope-guided cuff inflation Our hypothesis is Flow-Volume Loop-guided cuff pressure will be lower than Stethoscope-guided cuff pressure. This study also collect the incidence of common post-extubation respiratory adverse events coughing, hoarseness, stridor, croup as an secondary outcomes.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 1008800
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive