ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
The Comparison of Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Three Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic techniques have allowed surgeons to perform complicated intrabdominal surgery with minimal trauma. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been recognized since 1987 as the gold standard procedure for gallbladder surgery. Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) was developed with the aim of reducing the invasiveness of conventional laparoscopy. In this study we aimed to compare results of SILS cholecystectomy and three port conventional laparoscopic (TPCL) cholecystectomy prospectively
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Tri-Radial Port Extension for Difficult Gallbladder Extraction#878155
- Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Following ERCP in Concomitant Gallstones and Common Bile Duct Stones#843418
- Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy#842544
- Single Port Versus Four Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Early Postoperative Pain#831359
- Single-incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer#1074607
Record · ID 1008953
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive