ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Treatment Outcome and Patient-reported Outcomes in Patient Undergoing Non-surgical Root Canal Treatment With Different Irrigation Protocols
This study aims to evaluate and compare the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and laser-activated irrigation (LAI) versus conventional syringe irrigation in adult patients undergoing non-surgical root canal treatment on mature permanent teeth, and to identify the key factors that influence these outcomes.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effect of Different Irrigation Activating Techniques on Irrigant Penetration Depth and on Post-Operative Pain#863619
- A Study to Assess the Clinical Success of Root Canal Treatment Using Novel Obturation Material.#872152
- Effect of Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation on the Reduction of Bacteria and Endotoxins in Root Canals#836686
- Comparison of Ultrasonic vs 980-nm Diode Laser Irrigant Activation for Reducing Residual Bacterial DNA in Necrotic Teeth#905465
- The Effect of Apical Patency on Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Treatment#881475
Record · ID 1009388
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive