ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Accuracy of 1.5 T Versus 3 T Magnetic Resonance Arterial Spin Labeling to Measure Renal Blood Flow
In this study we want to compare the accuracy of two methods to measure renal perfusion by MRI spin labelling technique: the first measurement done with the 1.5 T MRI versus the second one obtained with the 3.0 T MRI (Siemens MRI device). Additionally we want to compare the changes of renal perfusion caused by physiological stress. The used stress test is the cold pressor test done at the forehead.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Renal Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Healthy Persons - Reproducibility and Impact of Stress#1031247
- Erector Spinae Plane Block in Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery#849565
- Clinical Study on a New Diagnostic Strategy for Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Based on MRI-FF#1094968
- MRI in Renal Transplantation#863171
- Trans-aortic Valve Replacement and Renal Infarction#901930
Record · ID 1009675
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive