ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Effectiveness of AI-Assisted Clinical Documentation
Effectiveness of AI-assisted clinical documentation tool (AI scribes) in healthcare services using staggered difference-in-differences and multiple sources of data including registers, questionnaires and interviews. Primary outcomes include completion of statutory health check-ups, working hours, time use of nurses, secondary outcomes include subjective nurse job satisfaction, job burden and perceived quality of work and time use.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AI-Assisted Clinical Documentation in Routine Danish General Practice: Quantitative Pre-Post Study.#1175564
- Why are health care interventions delivered over the internet? A systematic review of the published literature#271639
- Relationship between Additional Required Nursing Documentation and Patient Outcomes: A Scoping Review.#354694
- Patient-centered reporting: Should this become the new standard?#342520
- Development of a digital tool to support overview in complex patient cases: Which information elements support the clinical workflow?#220980
Record · ID 1010022
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive