ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilatation Versus Mechanical Lithotripsy for Large Stones
Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) combined with large balloon dilation (LBD) has been increasingly accepted as alternative method for removal of large bile duct stones. However, there were limited studies comparing the efficacy of EST in combined with LBD to EST with mechanical lithotripsy (ML). The purpose of this study to compare the efficacy and safety of combined EST- LBD versus EST-ML in the removal of very large bile duct stones.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Endoscopic sphincterotomy with balloon dilatation versus sphincterotomy alone for common bile duct stones removal#616045
- Long-term Outcomes of Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation for 8-12mm Bile Duct Stones: a Prospective Study#1114425
- EPLBD With Limited EST vs. EPLBD for Choledocholithiasis#847209
- Biodegradable Stents in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis#1150675
- Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plan Block in Patients Undergoing ESWL#1096366
Record · ID 1010101
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive