ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
The Influence of Explainability and Integrability of AI-CDSS on Usage Behavior Among Primary Care Physicians
The goal of this observational experimental study is to determine how system-level features of artificial intelligence clinical decision support systems (AI-CDSS)-specifically explainability and integrability-affect usage behavior among primary care physicians in China. The study focuses on licensed primary care physicians, regardless of gender, age, years of clinical experience, or prior AI exposure. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Do specific AI features (e.g., feature attribution, chain-of-thought explanation, seamless workflow integration, automated data input) independently influence physicians' adoption intention, diagnostic accuracy, and their perceptions of the system's usefulness and ease of use? * Do pairwise combinations of these AI features produce significant interaction effects-either synergistic or antagonistic-on these outcomes? Researchers will compare 32 distinct AI interface configurations generated from a 2⁶-¹ fractional factorial design (Resolution VI), each representing a unique combination of six binary AI features: (A) gradient-based feature importance (0 = absent, 1 = present), (B) chain-of-thought reasoning (0/1), (C) workflow integration (0 = multiple pop-up alerts, 1 = unified sidebar display), (D) automated data extraction (0 = manual entry, 1 = auto-populated from case text), (E) recommendation scope adapted to primary care settings (0 = restricted to essential options, 1 = full range of recommendations), and (F) model confidence display (0 = absent, 1 = present). This design enables unbiased estimation of all six main effects and all 15 two-way interactions. Participants will: Complete three standardized clinical case scenarios involving common respiratory infections via a web-based simulation platform; First provide an initial diagnosis and treatment plan without any AI input; Then review an AI-generated recommendation embedded with a randomly assigned combination of the six AI features; Revise their final diagnosis an
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond technology usefulness: Health system reliability, and socio-demographic and professional factors as shapers of technostress in physicians.#418385
- Acceptance of clinical artificial intelligence among physicians and medical students: A systematic review with cross-sectional survey#431448
- Exposing the Vanities—and a Qualified Defense—of Mechanistic Reasoning in Health Care Decision Making#740776
- The Effect of Review of a Decision Aid Prior to the Appointment on Decisional Conflict Compared to Usual Care in the Treatment of Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) Arthritis#906689
- Optimizing Digital Health Tools for Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in Federally Qualified Healthcare Centers: Insights From the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and Technology Acceptance Model.#258382
Record · ID 1010236
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive