ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Reliability of Light Induced Fluorescence Intraoral Camera Versus Visual-Tactile Method in Assessment of Marginal Integrity of Resin Composite Restorations: Diagnostic Invivo Study
This study will be conducted to assess diagnostic predictive values of a light induced fluorescence intraoral camera versus those of the visual-tactile assessment method according to FDI criteria in clinical evaluation the margins of resin composite restorations
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- In Vivo Assessment of the Tooth-Resin Composite Interface Using Optical Coherence Tomography#1126689
- Aesthetic Performance of Two Injectable Resin Composites in Class V Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial#883960
- Clinical Performance of Two Different Restorative Materials in Restoring Class II Cavities of Primary Molars#869901
- Preheated Composites Vs. Conventional Composites in Noncarious Cervical Lesions#917390
- Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material Versus Glass Hybrid Restorative in Posterior Restorations#811030
Record · ID 1010368
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive