PhilArchive
open access
Cognitive Architecture as Hidden Moderator: Reconciling Contradictory Emotion–Cognition Findings with the DLN Framework
Empirical findings on emotion-cognition relations often appear mutually contradictory: in some contexts emotion introduces systematic bias (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979; Slovic et al., 2007), yet in others it provides essential information for adaptive decision making (Bechara et al., 1994). Rather than treating these as competing explanations, this paper argues that the contradiction reflects a hidden moderator: the cognitive architecture governing how affective signals are represented, routed, and used. Drawing on appraisal theory (Lazarus, 1991), affective neuroscience (Pessoa, 2008; Lindquist et al., 2012), and somatic marker theory (Damasio, 1994), this paper proposes that these relationships vary systematically across cognitive developmental stages as defined by the DLN (Dot-Linear-Network) framework (Wu, 2026). Dot-stage cognition exhibits reactive emotional processing with minimal cognitive mediation; linear-stage cognition exhibits suppression or compartmentalization that enables sequential reasoning but creates systematic blind spots; network-stage cognition exhibits integrative fusion where affective signals inform cognitive processing and cognitive context modulates emotional response. A targeted umbrella synthesis of quantitative meta-analyses spanning emotion regulation (Webb et al., 2012), implicit cognition (Greenwald et al., 2009), interoception (Trevisan et al., 2019; Desmedt et al., 2022), and affective decision making (Zanini et al., 2025) identifies persistent heterogeneity patterns consistent with DLN stage as an unmodeled moderator. Ten falsifiable predictions are derived concerning interoceptive accuracy, emotional granularity, alexithymia, decision quality under emotional load, and implicit-explicit attitude discrepancies across stages. The resulting framework reframes the central debate: emotion functions as noise under linear suppression but as signal under network integration.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Binding Problem as Axiom Violation: Why Brain-Experience Correlations Cannot Prove Material Reality#74438
- Does J-Space Cross the Standpoint Threshold?#732383
- The Structural Mastery of Human Affect: Neurobiological and Somatic Foundations of the Core Emotion Framework#714492
- On Self-Manifestation · Inner Chapter 17 v1.0: Coloring — A Structural Model of Emotion, Preference, and Decision Bias#80288
- Role of the mesoamygdaloid dopamine projection in emotional learning#290358
Record · ID 101094
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive