arXiv (All)
open access
Governing Agentic AI in FinTech
Financial institutions are delegating consequential decisions to agentic AI systems that decompose goals, coordinate models and tools, and act with little oversight. Yet agentic AI governance in FinTech is under-investigated. We argue the binding governance constraint is not capability but verifiabi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A three-dimensional typology of agency for advanced AI systems#471290
- Artificial Intelligence as Stakeholder: A Novel Framework for Ethical Recognition in Value-Creation Ecosystems#78775
- Authority without Authorship: Delegation Thresholds in Agentic AI Systems#76720
- Reflective Restraint and the Language of Conscience in Advanced Systems: Moral Legibility, Governance Language, and Conscience-Performance Risk in AI Systems#204283
- Algorithmic Decision-Making, Agency Costs, and Institution-Based Trust#106613
Record · ID 1011182
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive