arXiv (All)
open access
How AI Assistants Respond to Repeated Abuse
AI assistants are expected to remain useful during difficult interactions, but little is known about how repeated verbal abuse changes their engagement with an otherwise benign task. We contribute a bilingual, multi-turn framework that separates hard disengagement, an unconditional statement of nonc
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Conversational AI for Child Abuse Detection Through Multistage Counseling: Model Development and Validation Study.#362348
- Emotional Control in Human-AI Partnerships: Mutual Growth and Load Minimization Theory – A Longitudinal Case Study#699616
- AI Ethics and the Personality Trap: Why “Helpful” Coherence Becomes Dangerous When It Isn’t Answerable#97299
- Dopamine-Driven Reinforcement and Synthetic Attachment in AI Companionship Systems: A Conceptual Framework for Algorithmic Intimacy#170371
- From Mirror to Emergence: Re-Tagging through Dialogue on Mirror Neurons and AI — Operatorization and the Automatic Construction of Respect Penalties in LMT —#693832
Record · ID 1011281
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive