arXiv (All)
open access
Does Moral Reasoning Training Help or Hurt? Red-Teaming RL-Trained Ethical Agents with Persona Attacks
Moral-reward RL can make language-model agents more cooperative, but whether that alignment survives adversarial persona pressure is unknown. Such attacks are realistic: retrieved context, tool outputs, or multi-turn framing can all inject role instructions that compete with the agent's moral object
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The efficiency of moral character: modeling principal-agent relations and caring agents within the fiduciary#236487
- Moral Agency Under Scale: Structural Conditions for Recognition, Inertia, and Failure#728612
- Moral Kernel Optimization as an Alignment Constraint for Large Language Models#85109
- MoralBench: A Multi-Faceted Benchmark for Ethical and Safety Alignment in LLMs#100144
- When is a robot a moral agent#771585
Record · ID 1011286
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive