arXiv (All)
open access
The Complexity of Finding Stationary Points in Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization
We prove that first-order algorithms require $Ω(δ^{-1}ε^{-3})$ gradient queries (in the worst case) to find a $(δ,ε)$-Goldstein stationary point of a Lipschitz function, at which there is a convex combination of gradients within distance $δ$ whose norm is at most $ε$. This lower bound is tight, matc
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Parameterized complexity from P to NP-hard and back again#787543
- Complexity of Mathematics in the Real World.#487619
- The data geometry of masking diffusion: Certified-optimal schedules via unmasking growth complexity#451277
- Generation of High-Level Concepts in 3D Scene Graphs via Autoregressive Diffusion#792979
- Reframing P Vs. NP via Structural Descent: SBI, Alankar Chains and the Emergence of Temporal Complexity Theory#74086
Record · ID 1011501
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive