arXiv (All)
open access
Do Frontier Models Seek Safety Evidence Before Acting?
Frontier models are often evaluated on how they respond to safety information once it is already in context. We study an earlier decision point: whether models choose to acquire safety-relevant evidence before acting. We introduce SAFE, a controlled benchmark in which models make deployment decision
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- When technology awakens willingness but stalls action: the asymmetric psychological translation of managerial safety cognition.#317954
- GUI-HARVEST: Self-Improving GUI Agents through Evidence-Driven Harness Evolution#1155883
- Beyond Routine Compliance: Cunning Data Cultivates Safety Vigilance in Large Language Models#1012696
- How Can We Make AI Understand Safety?#1121688
- A Mythos moment? Frontier AI and cyber risk#383434
Record · ID 1011580
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive