arXiv (All)
open access
Does AI Assistance Leave a Temporal Fingerprint? Detecting Overreliance in AI-Assisted Writing and Programming
The rapid adoption of generative AI has made final artifacts unreliable evidence of student learning, and AI detectors that examine only the finished product are inaccurate and ethically contentious. Process data offers an alternative, but prior work covers only English essay writing. We ask whether
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The cyclical ethical effects of using artificial intelligence in education#686533
- Schrödinger’s Copyright: A Proof by Absurdity of the Legal Inconsistency in AI-Generated Art#105016
- Reconsidering creativity: copyright protection for works generated using artificial intelligence#286844
- Artificial Intelligence and Cultural Production: Possible Impacts on Creativity and Copyright Law#964455
- Gleanings from the Harvest-Fields of Literature: A Melange of Excerpta#57192
Record · ID 1011598
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive