arXiv (All)
open access
QEMScore: How Much Does the Measurement Add to Learned Quantum Error Mitigation?
How much does the noisy measurement add to learned quantum error mitigation? An accuracy table cannot say, because a model handed circuit structure can score well without reading the measurement at all. QEMScore adds the comparison that can. Each simulated circuit carries an exact ideal answer. The
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Semi-definite optimization of the measured relative entropies of quantum states and channels#1076698
- What Changes When Fact-Verification Scores Improve? Evidence and Answer Accounting Across Trained Verifiers and LLMs#1063275
- Semantic Epistemology Redux: Proof and Validity in Quantum Mechanics#713283
- An optimal multi-objective paradigm for trade-off between strategic PMU deployment and enhanced state estimation accuracy.#236366
- OSCAR: Order-aware Scoring and Calibration for AI Rankings#1050313
Record · ID 1011611
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive