arXiv (All)
open access
Experimental Settings in LLM-Based Program Repair: A Study of Inputs, Tool Access, Feedback, and Validation
Evaluations of automated program repair (APR) systems commonly report the benchmark, the number of repaired defects, and the tests used for final patch validation, but these items no longer fully specify the repair task presented to a system. Recent LLM-based systems differ in the information suppli
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Experimental Settings in LLM-Based Program Repair: A Study of Inputs, Tool Access, Feedback, and Validation#965480
- When Fine-Tuning LLMs Meets Data Privacy: An Empirical Study of Federated Learning in LLM-Based Program Repair#303019
- Revisiting Feedback-Driven LLM Code Repair: A Replication and Exploratory Java Extension#627762
- If It's Not Buggy, Don't Fix It: On the Dynamics of Iterative Bug-fixing with LLMs#673594
- PonyEval: Evaluating LLM-Based Program Repair for Capability-Safe and Actor-Oriented Pony Software#1064376
Record · ID 1011704
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive