arXiv (All)
open access
Rethinking How We Evaluate Methodological Progress in Health AI
Methodological progress in artificial intelligence (AI) for electronic health records (EHRs) depends on our ability to determine which algorithms work better, and under which conditions. However, such progress is thought to be hindered by difficulties in reproducibility and in defining clinically me
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Sociotechnical Review of Algorithms in Health Systems: Technical, Cost, and Human-Centered Considerations#1036480
- Artificial intelligence in emergency medicine: from algorithmic performance to real-world clinical integration — understanding the implementation gap.#636403
- Artificial intelligence in emergency medicine: from algorithmic performance to real-world clinical integration — understanding the implementation gap#626803
- Patients’ Perceptions Toward Human–Artificial Intelligence Interaction in Health Care: Experimental Study#964517
- Artificial intelligence and algorithmic bias: implications for health systems#666658
Record · ID 1011830
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive