arXiv (All)
open access
Optimising the decision threshold in a weighted voting system: The case of the IMF's Board of Governors
In a weighted majority voting game, the players' weights are determined based on the constitutional planner's intentions. The weights are challenging to change in numerous cases, as they represent some desired disparity. However, the voting weights and the actual voting power do not necessarily coin
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Local decisions, diffusive influence, and lower bounds for graphical balanced allocation#1143327
- Complexity of Judgment Aggregation#727525
- Constraint Preferences: Inattention and Aggregation#1076905
- Binarization Flattens the Score Space#1130639
- Fairness trade-offs in expert evaluation: information, judgment, and procedural design#428767
Record · ID 1012020
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive