arXiv (All)
open access
Evaluating LLMs for Real-World Web Vulnerability Detection
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a promising tool for automated vulnerability detection, yet their effectiveness on web-specific vulnerabilities remains to be explored. This work benchmarks six frontier (Claude Opus 4.6, Codex GPT-5.4, Gemini 3.1-pro-preview) and open-weight models (Qw
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Revisiting Vul-RAG: Reproducibility and Replicability of RAG-based Vulnerability Detection with Open-Weight Models#1141559
- Retrieve, Reproduce, Reveal: Dissecting Retrieval-Augmented Software Vulnerability Detection#1141982
- Retrieve, Reproduce, Reveal: Dissecting Retrieval-Augmented Software Vulnerability Detection#1122356
- Interpreting and Steering for Safe and Correct Code Generation#799268
- Interpreting and Steering for Safe and Correct Code Generation#797845
Record · ID 1012247
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive