arXiv (All)
open access
I code or AI code: A comparative evaluation of AI-rated scores in classroom observations
Classroom observations are widely recognized as a key tool for establishing benchmarks of education quality and guiding pedagogical improvement, yet they remain resource-intensive and dependent on trained observers. This study evaluated the feasibility of using a LLM (GPT-5 model) to score teacher-c
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Teachers' collaborative evaluation of AI-generated content: Insights from a professional development workshop#655151
- Audio-visual Essay Assessment in Initial Teacher Education: An Exploration of Pre-service Teachers’ Experiences#1067875
- Who's Keeping Score? Interactive Steering of LLM-Powered Scoring with Attune#612387
- Who's Keeping Score? Interactive Steering of LLM-Powered Scoring with Attune#610910
- AI-Assisted Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews in Education#1051979
Record · ID 1012470
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive