arXiv (All)
open access
The Mirage of Calibrated Confidence: Trajectory-Independence of Verbalized Confidence in Vision-Language Models
A calibrated Vision-Language Model (VLM) can repeatedly self-correct, say "Wait, I should recheck," arrive at the wrong answer, and still report high confidence. We find that this occurs because verbalized confidence is largely trajectory-independent in the VLMs and calibration methods we evaluate.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- VLAConf: Calibrated Task-Success Confidence for Vision-Language-Action Models#615039
- VLAConf: Calibrated Task-Success Confidence for Vision-Language-Action Models#614072
- The Linear Representation Hypothesis for Vision-Language-Action Models#1105555
- From Knowing to Abstaining: Bridging the Representation-Action Gap in Vision-Language Models#1116984
- Focus Where It Counts: A Salience-Driven Vision-Language Model for Low Vision Assistance#784969
Record · ID 1012638
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive