arXiv (All)
open access
Which LLM is Best for Translating Natural Language Goals to PDDL
Bridging the gap between human intent and machine execution remains a challenge in automated planning, where expressing goals in formal languages like PDDL restricts accessibility to non-experts. This paper empirically evaluates whether current Large Language Models (LLMs) can reliably translate nat
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Which LLM is Best for Translating Natural Language Goals to PDDL#965462
- Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineers#16578
- Grounded Evaluation and Repair for NL-to-PDDL Problem Generation#996711
- From study design to executable code: automating target trial emulation with large language models.#358269
- From Study Design to Executable Code: Automating Target Trial Emulation with Large Language Models#18855
Record · ID 1012898
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive