PhilArchive
open access
Why Bohm and Only Bohm?
It is often claimed that there are three “realist” versions of quantum mechanics: the de Broglie–Bohm theory or Bohmian mechanics, the spontaneous collapse theories and the many worlds interpretation. We will explain why the two latter proposals suffer from serious defects coming from their ontology (or lack thereof) and that the many worlds interpretation is unable to account for the statistics encoded in the Born rule. The de Broglie–Bohm theory, on the other hand, has no problem of ontology and accounts naturally for the Born rule.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Quantum Mechanics, Metaphysics, and Bohm's Implicate Order#777407
- The Singular Substrate: A Speculative Quantum-Idealist Synthesis of Parmenidean Being, the Higgs Mechanism, and Holographic Ontology#704307
- The Universal Collapse Protocol: An Information First Framework for Physics, Consciousness, and System Transformation#114220
- Incoherent? No, Just Decoherent: How Quantum Many Worlds Emerge#79271
- More simulation hypothesis hullabaloo, a refutation redux#94491
Record · ID 101299
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive