arXiv (All)
open access
Transcribe, Then Reason: Two-Pass Decomposition for Multimodal Review
The natural way to review a long recording or document with a multimodal model is to hand it the raw source and ask for a review in one call. We show that this quietly fails: the model satisfices, dropping roughly a third of the content and embellishing the rest. The failure is not perception--almos
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Does Understanding Inform Generation in Unified Multimodal Models? From Analysis to Path Forward#1104916
- Beyond Blind Compliance: Benchmarking Task Verification in OCR Reasoning#819692
- Beyond Blind Compliance: Benchmarking Task Verification in OCR Reasoning#809696
- Evaluating the Evaluators: Diagnosing Large Multimodal Models for AI-Generated Image Assessment#1141893
- Dashboard2Code: Evaluating Multimodal Models on Reconstructing Interactive Dashboards#343544
Record · ID 1013114
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive