arXiv (All)
open access
What Affects the Performance of Fake Audio Detection? Analyzing Factors in a Continual Learning Setting
The increasing sophistication of deepfake audio generation technologies makes it important to develop robust fake audio detection systems that can adapt over time. This study examines how various factors impact the performance of detection systems in a continual learning setting. We focus on factors
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ToolDF: Tool-Integrated Reasoning for Mixed-Authenticity Audio Deepfake Detection#974625
- The digital companion: a study of how pupils interpret audiovisual works ; video 6 "Third combination"#315291
- The digital companion: a study of how pupils interpret audiovisual works ; video 4 "First combination"#315293
- The Media Literacy Illusion: Deepfake Detection Is a Cognitive Impossibility, Not a Skill Deficit#305984
- The digital companion: a study of how pupils interpret audiovisual works ; video 1 "Process"#315296
Record · ID 1013276
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive