arXiv (All)
open access
Optimized but Unowned: How AI-Authored Goals Undermine the Motivation They Are Meant to Drive
As AI tools become embedded in productivity and self-improvement contexts, a pressing question emerges: what happens when AI does the goal-setting for us? In a preregistered experiment (N = 470), we compared self-authored goals against LLM-authored goals derived from a personal reflection. LLM-gener
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond Benefit or Risk: Perceived Impact Profiles of Human-AI Affective Interaction and Their Associations with Psychological Functioning#1122659
- Can We Really Leverage AI-Assisted Automatic Item Generation for Psychological Scale Development?#928481
- Can We Really Leverage AI-Assisted Automatic Item Generation for Psychological Scale Development?#928092
- AI cannot replace human participants in behavioral research.#1158717
- ECLAIR: A Causally-Grounded AI Framework for Scientific Discovery in Empirical Software Engineering#424035
Record · ID 1013569
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive