arXiv (All)
open access
What Do Current Systematic Generalization Tasks Miss? A Reasoning-Centered Analysis
Systematic generalization, the ability to solve novel problems by recombining known atomic elements, is central to human intelligence but difficult to study rigorously under controlled settings. Existing studies therefore rely on simplifications such as approximately linear action composition, produ
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- FormalEvolve: Neuro-Symbolic Evolutionary Search for Diverse Autoformalization#821814
- Global Artificial Intelligence (GAI): Artificial Research By Deduction in SAIs#109689
- Where the standard approach in comparative neuroscience fails and where it works: General intelligence and brain asymmetries#766899
- Stellar Colosseum: A Many-Agent Harness for Long-Horizon Research in Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science#1123281
- SolveEdit: Benchmarking Visual Problem Solving in Generative Models#1130085
Record · ID 1013811
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive