arXiv (All)
open access
AUDITPLAN: Commit, Then Answer for Auditable Safety Alignment
Safety tuning pipelines judge only the final answer, which makes it difficult to distinguish robust refusal from two undesirable shortcuts: blanket refusal on benign requests and polished but unfaithful safety rationales that do not actually constrain the answer. We propose AUDITPLAN, a single-model
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AUDITPLAN: Commit, Then Answer for Auditable Safety Alignment#978377
- Probabilistic Agents in Deterministic Audits: Evaluating Multi-Agent Systems for Automated Audits Based on the German IT-Grundschutz#306960
- No Task Fails Every Time: Why One-Shot Audits Are Structurally Blind to Agent Damage#615261
- No Task Fails Every Time: Why One-Shot Audits Are Structurally Blind to Agent Damage#614294
- DEFENSIVE DECISION ARCHITECTURE: EXPLAINING MANAGERIAL CHOICE UNDER CONDITIONS OF AUDIT INTENSITY#276705
Record · ID 1013922
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive