arXiv (All)
open access
Omitted Variable Bias in Difference-in-Differences Designs
We study the omitted variable bias (OVB) problem in canonical difference-in-differences (DiD) designs when unobserved confounding induces departures from the parallel trends assumption. Our results provide a novel characterization of the OVB formula for the average treatment effect on the treated (A
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Editorial: Discounting models in behavioral health economics and quantitative health psychology, volume II#384182
- Estimands and estimation in trials with time trends#1144909
- Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies.#7363
- Addressing Selective Reporting Bias in Meta-Analysis of Dependent Effect Sizes: A Tutorial in R#29864
- Addressing Selective Reporting Bias in Meta-Analysis of Dependent Effect Sizes: A Tutorial in R#16562
Record · ID 1013982
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive