arXiv (All)
open access
MAGS: Multi-agent Auto-formalization Guarantees Safety for Agentic Outputs
LLM coding agents now generate complex programs at a scale that makes thorough human review increasingly difficult, raising the risk of safety and security failures. Common approaches, including fuzz testing, static analysis, and LLM-as-a-Verifier, can detect many failures but struggle to cover all
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- MAGS: Multi-agent Auto-formalization Guarantees Safety for Agentic Outputs#978375
- JTA: Joint Testability Architecture for Scenario-Based Validation of Safety-Critical Software#432605
- Beyond Generalist LLMs: Specialist Agentic Systems for Structured Code Workflow Execution#373464
- Agentic Auto-Research is Fuzz Testing#441835
- Program Analysis Guided LLM Agent for Proof-of-Concept Generation#2686
Record · ID 1013986
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive