arXiv (All)
open access
Use and Effects of LLMs in Peer Review: A Randomized Experiment and Survey at ICML 2026
LLMs are rapidly reshaping peer review, making it important to understand how reviewers use them in practice and how different LLM-use policies affect review outcomes. We investigate these questions through a randomized experiment and an anonymous post-survey at ICML 2026, a major machine learning c
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- mHealth Systems Need a Privacy-by-Design Approach: Commentary on “Federated Machine Learning, Privacy-Enhancing Technologies, and Data Protection Laws in Medical Research: Scoping Review” (Preprint)#1177110
- Reviewer Capability Governs Rejection Targeting, Not Repair Skill: Evidence from LLM Execute-Review-Revise Pipelines#660890
- A Survey on Blockchain-Based Federated Learning and Data Privacy#177322
- Short-Term Employment Surveys, 2020-2026: Secure Access#1002198
- mHealth Systems Need a Privacy-by-Design Approach: Commentary on “Federated Machine Learning, Privacy-Enhancing Technologies, and Data Protection Laws in Medical Research: Scoping Review”#461731
Record · ID 1014014
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive