arXiv (All)
open access
When fairness metrics fail: A utility-based perspective on $\varepsilon$-fairness
Fairness in decision-making processes is often quantified using probabilistic metrics. However, these metrics need not reflect the consequences of decisions for the affected individuals and groups. We develop a utility-based framework that incorporates these consequences into the assessment of fairn
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Fair equality of chances for prediction-based decisions#706235
- From Fair Representation to Just Recognition in Generative AI#971852
- Precaution and Fairness: A Framework for Distributing Costs of Protection from Environmental Risks#770214
- Counterfactual Desirability#702759
- Substantive fairness in the GDPR: Fairness Elements for Article 5.1a GDPR#964787
Record · ID 1014460
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive