arXiv (All)
open access
Systematic comparison of gender inequality in scientific rankings across disciplines
Participation of Women in academia has grown over recent decades. Yet, it is unclear how this growth translates into representation at the top of academic rankings (measured by scientific productivity and citations). Here, we investigate gender gaps in productivity, citations, and coauthorship netwo
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Are female scientists less inclined to publish alone? The gender solo research gap#403368
- The Tip of the Iceberg? Insights into the Prevalence of Publication Bias in Two Probability-Based Academic Panels#162890
- Specialization and the few women professors problem#82388
- Balancing Specialization and Adaptation in a Transforming Scientific Landscape#80954
- The Underrepresentation of Women in Prestigious Ethics Journals#746311
Record · ID 1014487
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive