Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law
metadata only
"Apprendi" and Plea Bargaining
Before "Apprendi", prosecutors using recidivism as a club could, and did, regularly insist that defendants admit aggravating facts as part of the plea or face additional time. When the prosecutor's threats of added time were not persuasive and the proof of aggravating facts weak, the defendant prior
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Capped Plea Discounts and Prosecutorial Resources: A Multilateral Model of Plea Bargaining Under Asymmetric Information#643628
- THE ANATOMY OF CHARGE STACKING: LEGAL LIMITS ON CUMULATIVE ALLEGATIONS IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE#429131
- The sensitivity of legal proof#92351
- A (Moral) Prisoner's Dilemma: Character Ethics and Plea Bargaining#741628
- Applications of Character Evidence in Civil and Criminal Cases#648143
Record · ID 1019508
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive