Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law
metadata only
Apres Apprendi
The Court in Apprendi v. New Jersey, ___ U.S. ___ (2000), held as a matter of due process that any fact, other than a prior conviction, that increases the penalty for an offense beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proven beyond a reasonable doubt. In a longer fort
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- 2 U.S.C. § 390 — Penalty for failure to appear, testify, or produce documents#558349
- 35 U.S.C. § 133 — Time for prosecuting application#586636
- 2 U.S.C. § 1401 — Procedure for consideration of alleged violations#558116
- The New Jersey Law Journal, Volume XLV, No. 2, February, 1922#58368
- Plus Ca Change . . . or If Hard Cases Make Bad Law, What Do Bad Cases Make?#1019400
Record · ID 1019509
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive