Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law
metadata only
Form vs. Function in Rule 10B-5 Class Actions
The Supreme Court’s widely anticipated decision last term in Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. did little to change the fundamental landscape of securities fraud litigation in the United States. Rule 10b-5 class actions premised on the “fraud-on-the-market” presumption of reliance may stil
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The capital-market effects of introducing private rights of action in securities regulation: Evidence from the United Kingdom#1065541
- GOVERNING SECURITIES CLASS ACTIONS#494781
- Is Stock a Security? A Criticism of the Sale of Business Doctrine in Securities Fraud Litigation#494631
- The Artful Dodgers: Securities Fraud, Artful Pleading, and Preemption of State Law Causes of Action Under the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act#494834
- Irresistible Forces and Political Obstacles: Securities Litigation Reform and the Structural Regulation of Corporate Governance#494357
Record · ID 1019553
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive