Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law
metadata only
A Distinction Without a Difference: Convergence in Claim Construction Standards
In 2007, a district court found a patent for a medical device valid. While the district court litigation was pending, however, the Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") found the exact same patent invalid. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit then affirmed both decisions. At first glance, the
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Early Prediction of Spontaneous Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA) Closure and PDA-Associated Outcomes#148598
- Does Caudal Block Increase the Incidence of Urethrocutaneous Fistula Formation Following Hypospadias Repair in Infants?#858867
- Proceedings from the 2025 Midwest Pediatric Device Consortium showcase featuring software as a medical device.#174523
- Proceedings from the 2025 Midwest Pediatric Device Consortium showcase featuring software as a medical device#170860
- Prospective Clinical Follow-up After the Percutaneous Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale#871964
Record · ID 1019661
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive