Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
metadata only
Attempt to Monopolize: Dangerous Probability of Success as an Obstacle to Enforcing Section 2 of the Sherman Act
This Comment analyzes the conflicting definitions of "attempt to monopolize" as applied to the Sherman Act. First, the Comment outlines the majority position requiring proof of "dangerous probability of success" in an "attempt to monopolize" case under section 2 of the Sherman Act. Next, the Comment
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Debunking the Purchaser Welfare Account of Section 2 of the Sherman Act: How Harvard Brought Us a Total Welfare Standard and Why We Should Keep It#1148974
- 12 U.S.C. § 43 — Interpretations concerning preemption of certain State laws#565145
- Antitrust Laws with Amendments, 1890-1956#922548
- 30 U.S.C. § 1603 — Implementation of policies#584290
- Against maximizing act-consequentialism (june 30, 2008)#774510
Record · ID 1019884
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive